I am writing this to caution anyone thinking about using FastESALetter in 2026. I chose the service because it promised efficiency, legitimacy, and compliance. While it did deliver a document quickly, that speed came with consequences I did not anticipate and would not risk again.

From the outset, the experience felt automated and impersonal. The process was clearly designed to move users through as fast as possible, not to determine whether an ESA letter was clinically appropriate. There was no sense of professional curiosity or individualized judgment. It felt like the system was built to produce an outcome rather than evaluate one.

The assessment itself was minimal and superficial. The questions barely scratched the surface and did not invite any meaningful discussion of my mental health history or current situation. Nothing about the process resembled a real clinical evaluation. At no point did it feel like a licensed professional was actively assessing my needs.

When the ESA letter arrived, it immediately raised concerns. The language was generic and lightly customized, making it obvious that it came from an online ESA service. In 2026, landlords and property managers recognize these documents instantly. Instead of offering protection, the letter drew skepticism and increased scrutiny.

The most significant issue emerged when the letter was questioned. At that point, FastESALetter’s involvement effectively ended. There was no clear guidance on verification, no meaningful response to landlord inquiries, and no willingness to stand behind the document. Communication became vague and unhelpful, offering reassurance without substance.

What makes this especially problematic is how the service is positioned. Speed is marketed as the main advantage, but when it comes to ESA documentation, speed often undermines credibility. In a housing environment where verification is common, a rushed and formulaic letter can create more problems than it solves.

ESA requirements in 2026 are not forgiving. Weak documentation can trigger challenges that would not otherwise occur. Services that function primarily as document generators rather than mental health providers leave users exposed when housing stability is at stake.

FastESALetter provided a fast PDF, but nothing beyond that. It did not provide confidence, support, or protection when the letter faced real scrutiny. I regret relying on this service and would not recommend it to anyone whose housing situation depends on an ESA letter being defensible.

If you genuinely need an ESA letter, the safest path is working directly with a licensed mental health professional who knows your history, conducts a real evaluation, and can stand behind their assessment if challenged. In housing matters, shortcuts do not just fail. They can actively make things worse.